Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

wcVersion fails for big wc (>70MB) [Tigris #1006] #2

Open
markphip opened this issue Sep 15, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

wcVersion fails for big wc (>70MB) [Tigris #1006] #2

markphip opened this issue Sep 15, 2016 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@markphip
Copy link
Contributor

Description

I have a working copy that contains around 120MB of libraries and sources. While
running wcVersion on it it fails with message:
build.xml:532: Can't get summary status for path D:\my_path_ini_here
When I reduce the size of wc to around 60MB it starts working correctly again!

Looks like a bug doesn't it?

Metadata Imported from Tigris (Issue 1006)

  • Creation Date: 2009-10-13 04:50:03
  • Reporter: drebin
  • Subcomponent: svnant
  • Version: unspecified
  • Milestone: not determined
  • Keywords:
  • Cc:

Comments

2011-01-03 15:29:27 by deepakpn

I see the same behavior too; wcVersion errors with the following message:

"Can't get summary status for path ..."

However, it does work on smaller working copies.

Any suggestions to make it work on larger working copies?

2011-01-11 11:15:09 by costamojan

I will setup a test scenario locally to verify whether this can be reproduced or
not.

Best regards

Daniel Kasmeroglu

2011-01-14 16:57:48 by costamojan

Hm,

Until now I wasn't able to reproduce this error. I've tested it with a huge
working copy (an amount of 2G).
I'm reassigning this bug to you in order to get more information:

  * run the Ant with the verbose switch (-v) in order to get a more detailed log
  * execute Ant with a bigger heap (-Xmx)

Best regards

Daniel Kasmeroglu

2011-01-14 16:58:52 by costamojan

P.S: Try it out with a recent build (http://www.kasisoft.com/hudson/job/svnant).
Maybe the issue is already gone.

Best regards

Daniel Kasmeroglu
@markphip markphip added the bug label Sep 15, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant