Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Confirm the coordinate frame for Fermi RA/dec #23

Open
ayshih opened this issue May 30, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Confirm the coordinate frame for Fermi RA/dec #23

ayshih opened this issue May 30, 2019 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ayshih
Copy link
Member

ayshih commented May 30, 2019

In sunpy.instr.fermi, both get_detector_sun_angles_for_time() and get_detector_sun_angles_for_date() call sunpy.sun.sun functions to get the Sun's right ascension and declination. They use the functions for the apparent RA/dec referenced to the equinox of date, but I suspect that Fermi reports the spacecraft RA/dec (and hence the detectors' RA/dec) as astrometric RA/dec referenced to the J2000.0 epoch. (With sunpy/sunpy#3137, we can now provide precisely that RA/dec.) The coordinate frame used by Fermi needs to be confirmed, and the RA/dec calls changed if necessary.

Ping @aringlis

@aringlis
Copy link
Member

@ayshih I'll look into this.

@aringlis
Copy link
Member

@ayshih, the headers for the Fermi spacecraft pointing files include the following entry:

EQUINOX = 2000. / equinox for ra and dec

So it looks like you're correct that the functions in sunpy.instr.fermi need to be changed.

@ayshih
Copy link
Member Author

ayshih commented Jun 20, 2019

Great! You also need to confirm whether the RA/dec are astrometric or apparent. That is, whether spacecraft motion is taken out (astrometric) or not (apparent).

@aringlis
Copy link
Member

That I can't figure out from the information in the pointing files. I'll send a query to the Fermi helpdesk, that's probably the easiest solution.

@nabobalis nabobalis transferred this issue from sunpy/sunpy Sep 28, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants