Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Computing the ratio of the seasonal (three month) means #6

Open
ivanhanigan opened this issue Mar 15, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Computing the ratio of the seasonal (three month) means #6

ivanhanigan opened this issue Mar 15, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@ivanhanigan
Copy link
Member

@farhadsalimi, @ozjimbob The 2009 work for the 2011 paper used a rolling centred 90 day mean.
NB -45 and + 44 after reading the SAS CMOVAVE info as this is what it does when given an even number (90).

Is this worth recreating in R? Latest codes at https://github.com/swish-climate-impact-assessment/BiosmokeValidatedEvents/blame/master/inst/doc/impute_aphea2_sydney_pm25.Rmd#L200
use calendar seasons DJF (Summer), MAM, JJA, SON.

@farhadsalimi
Copy link
Contributor

@ivanhanigan I don't believe it is really worth it as Katsouyanni et al, even used yearly ratio (http://pubs.healtheffects.org/getfile.php?u=518), page 10

@ivanhanigan
Copy link
Member Author

I also believe it is not really worth it, but not because Katsouyanni used
yearly. I suspect they did that because it was easier not because they
thought it wouldn't matter.
I think we should check what is difference between your 3 monthly calendar
season approach and my rolling 3-mo-centred approach.
But not this week.

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:14 PM, farhadsalimi [email protected]
wrote:

@ivanhanigan https://github.com/ivanhanigan I don't believe it is
really worth it as Katsouyanni et al, even used yearly ratio (
http://pubs.healtheffects.org/getfile.php?u=518), page 10


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#6 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants