You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think the basic idea here is sort of a CDMA-meets-Onion routing approach, where you have a certain band(s) for the mesh will use. An epoch in that sense is a seed which pre-determines the time/frequency pattern of knocks and the encryption of their contents. Each mote ends up knowing the epoch(s) and z-index of all the other motes in physical range, [?] because until it does it communicates via a shared "lost mote" epoch on which neighbor information is broadcast.
When a message needs to be sent between any two motes, the source mote will send it to the highest z-index mote it knows (i.e. to its router), by choosing whichever of the epochs it considers most optimal. The packet is encrypted using that epoch as a key, and [?] broadcast at a particular time/channel also determined by the epoch.
Now when the source mote's router receives the packet, it decrypts the contents, revealing its payload — [?] half of which will be the destination hashname. If the destination is the mote itself, done. If the destination is in the mote's neighborhood [could it know this? I thought only the top-level router tracked those associations?] then it repeats the encrypt/knock process to that specific mote. Otherwise the packet goes again to the router.
If the packet makes it all the way to the top-level router without being delivered, the top level router will bounce it back "downwards". How it does this is curious to me — it can send it to lower-level router in the right direction, but it seems unless that router has the target in its immediate neighborhood the packet would end up back at the top-level again. Perhaps this is the clue:
A router … inherits the responsibility to monitor each neighbor's neighborhood for other routers and establish direct or bridged links with them.
So these routers are not just aware of the physical neighborhood sense, but also are serving in the Telehash sense.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think the basic idea here is sort of a CDMA-meets-Onion routing approach, where you have a certain band(s) for the mesh will use. An epoch in that sense is a seed which pre-determines the time/frequency pattern of knocks and the encryption of their contents. Each mote ends up knowing the epoch(s) and z-index of all the other motes in physical range, [?] because until it does it communicates via a shared "lost mote" epoch on which neighbor information is broadcast.
When a message needs to be sent between any two motes, the source mote will send it to the highest z-index mote it knows (i.e. to its router), by choosing whichever of the epochs it considers most optimal. The packet is encrypted using that epoch as a key, and [?] broadcast at a particular time/channel also determined by the epoch.
Now when the source mote's router receives the packet, it decrypts the contents, revealing its payload — [?] half of which will be the destination hashname. If the destination is the mote itself, done. If the destination is in the mote's neighborhood [could it know this? I thought only the top-level router tracked those associations?] then it repeats the encrypt/knock process to that specific mote. Otherwise the packet goes again to the router.
If the packet makes it all the way to the top-level router without being delivered, the top level router will bounce it back "downwards". How it does this is curious to me — it can send it to lower-level router in the right direction, but it seems unless that router has the target in its immediate neighborhood the packet would end up back at the top-level again. Perhaps this is the clue:
So these routers are not just aware of the physical neighborhood sense, but also are serving in the Telehash sense.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: