Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test: StormLmcSpec: Need to update ISL-related test due to the incorrect logic. #5504

Open
yuliiamir opened this issue Dec 1, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@yuliiamir
Copy link
Collaborator

TC: "System's able to fail an ISL if switches on both ends go offline during restart of network topology"
Currently, this test has been ignored in the scope of #5503.
After rebuilding Kilda with up-test-mode (network topology), this test was rerun and failed.
Further investigation is required:

✘ System's able to fail an ISL if switches on both ends go offline during restart of network topology (5m)

    Condition failed with Exception:
    
    Wrappers.wait(discoveryTimeout + WAIT_OFFSET) { def allIsls = northbound.getAllLinks() assert islUtils.getIslInfo(allIsls, islUnderTest).get().state == IslChangeType.FAILED assert islUtils.getIslInfo(allIsls, islUnderTest.reversed).get().state == IslChangeType.FAILED }
        at org.openkilda.functionaltests.spec.xresilience.StormLcmSpec.System's able to fail an ISL if switches on both ends go offline during restart of network topology(StormLcmSpec.groovy:136)
    Caused by: org.openkilda.functionaltests.helpers.Wrappers$WaitTimeoutException: Condition was not satisfied within 30.0 seconds
        at org.openkilda.functionaltests.helpers.Wrappers.wait(Wrappers.groovy:109)
        ... 1 more
    Caused by: Condition not satisfied:
    
    islUtils.getIslInfo(allIsls, islUnderTest).get().state == IslChangeType.FAILED
 at org.openkilda.functionaltests.spec.xresilience.StormLcmSpec.System's able to fail an ISL if switches on both ends go offline during restart of network topology_closure9(StormLcmSpec.groovy:138)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant