I'd like to ask why you chose to use bindgen but not cxx.

[ghjdegithub]

No description provided.

[thewh1teagle]

cxx is used for C++, and bindgen is for C. Since sherpa-onnx exposes a C API, we use bindgen. Even if it were C++, I wouldn't choose cxx. I worked with a cxx codebase a while ago, and I find that using bindgen along with custom C++ wrappers with C makes the code much more readable when writing bindings for a C++ library.

[thewh1teagle]

For instance see this cxx based crate which in my opinion is not readable at all:
https://github.com/jkawamoto/ctranslate2-rs/tree/main/src/sys

Versus another small wrapper I created to C++ code:
https://github.com/thewh1teagle/knf-rs/tree/main/sys (See knfc folder)

[csukuangfj]

FYI: k2-fsa/sherpa-onnx#1455 provides a C++ wrapper for sherpa-onnx's C API.

[ghjdegithub]

FYI: k2-fsa/sherpa-onnx#1455 provides a C++ wrapper for sherpa-onnx's C API.

What are the languages currently officially supported by the API, can you list them on the reademe?

[csukuangfj]

Please see
https://github.com/k2-fsa/sherpa-onnx?tab=readme-ov-file#supported-programming-languages

12 languages are supported by sherpa-onnx at present.

We may support more if needed.

[ghjdegithub]

officially

I mean to distinguish between official support and unofficial support