You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So, this using labels to drill down in filters (my only real reason for them) pretty useless without making a bunch of accommodations that makes the whole point of labels pretty moot. Example, labeling ever single entities thats not in a group "not group" and putting it in exclude, but that means I need 20 not group labels because there is one group in the domain.
So, could you please consider making the and/or/not functions allow the duplicating Label Key? This would make the world a much better place!
Thanks.... Love your stuff.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I labeled my devices by function (i.e. "Shade"") Some things that are labeled "Shade" are also "Group" because they are a group of shades.
If I want the shades that are only group I would
But this throws a "duplicate key mapping."
Using "and, or, not" doesn't seem to work either. It does not throw an error, it just retunes no results:
So, this using labels to drill down in filters (my only real reason for them) pretty useless without making a bunch of accommodations that makes the whole point of labels pretty moot. Example, labeling ever single entities thats not in a group "not group" and putting it in exclude, but that means I need 20 not group labels because there is one group in the domain.
So, could you please consider making the and/or/not functions allow the duplicating Label Key? This would make the world a much better place!
Thanks.... Love your stuff.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: