Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explore the possibility of putting all type annotations in patterns #11

Open
thufschmitt opened this issue Apr 27, 2017 · 0 comments
Open
Milestone

Comments

@thufschmitt
Copy link
Owner

So instead of λp:τ.e, we would get λp.e, but with p containing − mandatory − type matching.

For example, x:τ would be the pattern matching on values of type τ

@thufschmitt thufschmitt added this to the first draft milestone Apr 27, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant