You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now copy number estimation is artificial because it only takes into account the self contained database (check here). This will fail if for instance we want to know plasmid copy number in a bacteria. Therefore it would be interesting to allow the user to provide a genome that allows to estimate the copy number for that genome as a standard and then use the same approach for plasmids where the median value for the median multiplicity values would be compared between chromosomal dna and plasmid dna (with chromosomal dna being the default copy number).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now copy number estimation is artificial because it only takes into account the self contained database (check here). This will fail if for instance we want to know plasmid copy number in a bacteria. Therefore it would be interesting to allow the user to provide a genome that allows to estimate the copy number for that genome as a standard and then use the same approach for plasmids where the median value for the median multiplicity values would be compared between chromosomal dna and plasmid dna (with chromosomal dna being the default copy number).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: