You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After a couple weeks away from parsnip, I was trying to remember the convention for finding engine-specific help-files. I eventually remembered it was ?details_model_type_engine, e.g. ?details_linear_reg_glmnet, but this made me wonder if just using ?model_type_engine, e.g. ?linear_reg_glmnet, would make these more discoverable, as folks are probably thinking to type ?linear_reg to search for that documentation in the first place and would get autocomplete then.
For back-compatibility, this would probably just be an alias rather than a proper rename.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
After a couple weeks away from parsnip, I was trying to remember the convention for finding engine-specific help-files. I eventually remembered it was
?details_model_type_engine
, e.g.?details_linear_reg_glmnet
, but this made me wonder if just using?model_type_engine
, e.g.?linear_reg_glmnet
, would make these more discoverable, as folks are probably thinking to type?linear_reg
to search for that documentation in the first place and would get autocomplete then.For back-compatibility, this would probably just be an alias rather than a proper rename.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: