You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In my understanding, fatten was a workaround for the inability of controlling the point size and the line width differently. So, now that #3672 gets merged, I think geom_pointrange() no longer needs this parameter.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
yutannihilation
changed the title
Deprecate fatten arg of geom_pointrange()
Can we deprecate fatten arg of geom_pointrange()?
Jun 19, 2022
Thinking this again, geom_crossbar() still needs fatten on the other hand because the middle bar is also line, not point. So, this seems a bit complicated than I thought. Anyway I think we need to clarify the relationship between size, linewidth, and fatten.
If there's no downside, I think it's nice if we can include this in v3.4.0. It might be another good example to show why separating linewidth from size is useful.
A follow up of #3672. Related to #4872, #2798
In my understanding,
fatten
was a workaround for the inability of controlling the point size and the line width differently. So, now that #3672 gets merged, I thinkgeom_pointrange()
no longer needs this parameter.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: