You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently pack/unpack have a .name_sep argument that packs/unpacks names as <Outer><sep><Inner>. I am working with a data set where the names are <Inner><sep><Outer>. There is no easy way of dealing with this set up. The .names parameter used by across deals with this easily by having a glue specification with {.col} being used as a mask. It seems like something similar would be simple to achieve for pack/unpack where .names would have masks for {.inner} and {outer}, perhaps with a default of "{.outer}.{.inner}".
If this is something you would consider, I can try to put together a PR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently
pack
/unpack
have a.name_sep
argument that packs/unpacks names as<Outer><sep><Inner>
. I am working with a data set where the names are<Inner><sep><Outer>
. There is no easy way of dealing with this set up. The.names
parameter used byacross
deals with this easily by having a glue specification with{.col}
being used as a mask. It seems like something similar would be simple to achieve forpack
/unpack
where.names
would have masks for{.inner}
and{outer}
, perhaps with a default of"{.outer}.{.inner}"
.If this is something you would consider, I can try to put together a PR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: