We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
能问问情感分析具体是以怎样的标准认定是否为水军的吗?比如正文的情感分析结果呈现出怎样的结果就认定其为水军?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
没有固定标准,特殊情况特殊处理,有的分析只需要数值指标(关注数,粉丝数之类的),有的分析只需要文本,但是最终要怎么样,这是要慢慢摸出来的。 比如某套规则如果适用于微博用户群体,就不一定适用于twitter。对于微博来说,水军发言比较容易摸出套路,也经常会发些乱码(毕竟淘宝上卖的水军,几百家店都是共用估计十几个水军算法),所以只要好好思考好特定的输入结构(比如粉丝互动数就是不错的指标,文本就更不用说了但是要做好预处理),建立对应模型,然后测试集准确率高于70% 那么基本就可以理清思路了,然后慢慢修改输入结构和模型从而提升鲁棒性。反正水军发言和行为的套路越统一,准确率会越高,比如我这里就是怎么试都是90%以上。
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
能问问情感分析具体是以怎样的标准认定是否为水军的吗?比如正文的情感分析结果呈现出怎样的结果就认定其为水军?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: