You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Within #145, there are very simple tests to detect whether pe-parse would correctly identify the executables as PE, without erroring. Unfortunately (but not unexpectedly), there are a few executables that are not parsed correctly.
Ideally, we should at least test and enforce that we support parsing of any PE in the Corkami dataset.
There are no test exceptions (read: known failures) when processing the Corkami dataset of PEs
Secondly, a much bigger task would be to confirm that pe-parse is correctly parsing all and only the information that the Corkami PEs claim to exhibit.
There are specific PE field tests/asserts for the Corkami PEs to ensure correctness
Then, running the standalone dump-pe tool that is included in this repo should be an easy way to iterate on code changes, since the testing logic is basically the same.
Use that information as a starting point for where to begin debugging. Moreover, most, if not all, of the PEs have a corresponding asm file that provides the source code for building the PE and how the file is constructed. Use this information to gain a better understanding of why pe-parse is having difficulty parsing it and what kind of fix would be needed. Here it is for our example https://github.com/corkami/pocs/blob/master/PE/virtsectblXP.asm
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Within #145, there are very simple tests to detect whether pe-parse would correctly identify the executables as PE, without erroring. Unfortunately (but not unexpectedly), there are a few executables that are not parsed correctly.
Ideally, we should at least test and enforce that we support parsing of any PE in the Corkami dataset.
Reference to known failing tests:
pe-parse/tests/corkami_test.cpp
Lines 34 to 51 in 4286f10
Secondly, a much bigger task would be to confirm that pe-parse is correctly parsing all and only the information that the Corkami PEs claim to exhibit.
How to Start Investigating
First, run
git submodule update --init
to pull the Corkami dataset (We will be focusing on the PEs here https://github.com/corkami/pocs/tree/master/PE/bin).Then, running the standalone
dump-pe
tool that is included in this repo should be an easy way to iterate on code changes, since the testing logic is basically the same.Use that information as a starting point for where to begin debugging. Moreover, most, if not all, of the PEs have a corresponding
asm
file that provides the source code for building the PE and how the file is constructed. Use this information to gain a better understanding of why pe-parse is having difficulty parsing it and what kind of fix would be needed. Here it is for our example https://github.com/corkami/pocs/blob/master/PE/virtsectblXP.asmThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: