Build node bridge in CI

[grdddj]

Tries to build an exportable artifact with bin.js file containing node-bridge code

To be used by tenv - taking the latest artefact from develop

[grdddj]

Seems to work fine already - see https://github.com/trezor/trezor-suite/actions/runs/11105572536

Consideration - instead (in addition) to saving this as GH-Actions artifacts, it might be beneficial to save it on dev.trezor.io as well ... one benefit is that we would not need ani GH API keys to get it nightly into tenv, and it would be just one non-changing URL

• there are already some CI jobs in Suite uploading stuff there, I guess we would just need to agree on (and create?) a specific folder (URL) for it
• in that case, we would change it to run only on develop branch probably, so it is not being rewritten by other branches

[mroz22]

I am not familiar with dev.trezor.io but we are using dev.suite.sldev.cz heavily. For example, recently we added a webusb testere utility here https://dev.suite.sldev.cz/transport-test/develop/.

I am totally ok for using it for this artifact. It should be uploaded probably only for develop branch so that it doesn't bloat too much.

[mroz22]

I am ok with it but maybe, for consistency purposes - shouldn't it contain branch name here? consider other jobs

[grdddj]

I have deleted the branch name on purpose, as it will only run in develop branch ... but will include it again

[mroz22]

is this full yarn install needed? wouldn't yarn focus to transport-bridge folder suffice?

[grdddj]

No idea at all here, but will try it

[mroz22]

this way it installs all the dependencies. In frequently run jobs, it makes sense to optimize it using yarn focus. here it is less relevant but still a good practice to follow if possible

[vdovhanych]

This makes no sense; it will build a node bridge for any PR that you add a label to. Why??

[grdddj]

Because I do not know workflow syntax well and I copied it like this from some other .yml file. Agreed that it is redundant, I will remove it.

Do you have some other possible improvements, when I will be already making another PR with changes?

[vdovhanych]

This was the only thing that i noticed

[grdddj]

Thanks for that. I created a PR for it - #14742