feat(jsonrpc): jsonrpc supports finalized #6007
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
317787106
reviewed
Nov 15, 2024
framework/src/main/java/org/tron/core/services/jsonrpc/filters/LogFilterWrapper.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
waynercheung
changed the title
317787106
approved these changes
Feb 14, 2025
halibobo1205
approved these changes
Feb 14, 2025
CodeNinjaEvan
approved these changes
Feb 14, 2025
yuekun0707
approved these changes
Feb 14, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
make eth_getBlockByNumber and other methods supports finalized as below:
eth_getBlockByNumbereth_getBlockTransactionCountByNumbereth_getTransactionByBlockNumberAndIndexeth_newFiltereth_getLogsWhy are these changes required?
For many developers, they need to get the latest solidified/finalized block number, then fetch other data by this number.
For more details, visit issue #5953
This PR has been tested by:
Follow up
Extra details