You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We now have a single method compare which produces one (well, several related) measures of distance between two ARGs. It's not clear to me how this package would evolve over time if we wanted to add other ways to compare them. Suppose we just wanted the standard span-weighted tree-by-tree comparison, like
Do you imagine things like this getting folded into the single uber-function compare (a-la msprime.sim_ancestry), or the API growing additional entry points @petrelharp? If the latter, maybe we should chose something a bit more specific than compare as the name?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We now have a single method
compare
which produces one (well, several related) measures of distance between two ARGs. It's not clear to me how this package would evolve over time if we wanted to add other ways to compare them. Suppose we just wanted the standard span-weighted tree-by-tree comparison, likeDo you imagine things like this getting folded into the single uber-function
compare
(a-la msprime.sim_ancestry), or the API growing additional entry points @petrelharp? If the latter, maybe we should chose something a bit more specific thancompare
as the name?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: