You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Just a quick thought: would it be helpful to cache the number of variable sites in a tree sequence, as well as the number of actual sites? I am starting to encounter cases where sites are defined but have no associated mutations. ts.num_variable_sites would seem like a sensible thing. I guess it might get hairy when there are mutations but no variation, however (e.g. if the mutations are reverted, or do not change the state)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just a quick thought: would it be helpful to cache the number of variable sites in a tree sequence, as well as the number of actual sites? I am starting to encounter cases where sites are defined but have no associated mutations. ts.num_variable_sites would seem like a sensible thing. I guess it might get hairy when there are mutations but no variation, however (e.g. if the mutations are reverted, or do not change the state)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: