Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test multiple GHC versions/configurations on CI #1403

Closed
aherrmann opened this issue Jul 28, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Test multiple GHC versions/configurations on CI #1403

aherrmann opened this issue Jul 28, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
P2 major: an upcoming release type: feature request

Comments

@aherrmann
Copy link
Member

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
rules_haskell can be used with different GHC versions and GHC in different configurations. However, CI currently only tests GHC 8.8 provided by GHC bindist or nixpkgs on Linux and MacOS and GHC 8.6 provided by bindist on Windows. That means that some versions are untested, e.g. 8.6 or 8.10 on Unix. It also leaves some configurations untested, e.g. GHC with static RTS or GHC with fully static linking as is supported.

Describe the solution you'd like
We should test the versions and configurations of GHC that we consider supported on CI.

Additional context
This is related to #1402 in that the CI setup for multiple GHC versions and configurations may be similar to that for multiple Bazel versions.

@Xophmeister Xophmeister added the P3 minor: not priorized label Feb 21, 2022
@Xophmeister
Copy link
Member

#1668 is effectively a duplicate of this

@Xophmeister Xophmeister added P2 major: an upcoming release and removed P3 minor: not priorized labels Feb 21, 2022
@GuillaumeGen
Copy link
Contributor

Duplicate of #458

@GuillaumeGen GuillaumeGen marked this as a duplicate of #458 Jul 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
P2 major: an upcoming release type: feature request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants