diff --git a/1409/01_mastermind/mastermind_submissions.yml b/1409/01_mastermind/mastermind_submissions.yml
index 5ec2d7fb6..7ccb5335b 100644
--- a/1409/01_mastermind/mastermind_submissions.yml
+++ b/1409/01_mastermind/mastermind_submissions.yml
@@ -1,13 +1,17 @@
 submissions:
   Alex Jensen:
     repository: https://github.com/danajensen/mastermind
-    notes: ""
-    evaluation:
-      Fundamental Ruby & Style: 0
-      Enumerable & Collections: 0
-      Test-Driven Development: 0
-      REPL Interface: 0
-      Breaking Logic into Components: 0
+    notes: "Shows strong effort toward organization. Some closely-coupled objects.
+            Good use of best-choice enumerables (collect, any? zip).
+            Well-tested in isolation and integration.
+            Integrated difficulty level in REPL. Clear to use.
+            Saw intent to break apart logical components, but some objects tied together that will make future iterations or changes difficult to implement."
+    evaluation:
+      Fundamental Ruby & Style: 3.5
+      Enumerable & Collections: 4
+      Test-Driven Development: 4
+      REPL Interface: 3.5
+      Breaking Logic into Components: 3
   Herbert Joseph:
     repository: https://github.com/Copywright/mastermind
     notes: "Don't kill me..."
@@ -100,7 +104,9 @@ submissions:
       Breaking Logic into Components: 0
   Chase van Hekken:
     repository: https://github.com/ChasevanHekken/mastermind-game.git
-    notes: ""
+    notes: "Definitely shows a growing grasp of OO concepts and idiomatic Ruby.
+            had some long and methods that did multiple things.
+            Also had a few classes that had to reach a bit too deeply to keep the game logic together."
     evaluation:
       Fundamental Ruby & Style: 2.5
       Enumerable & Collections: 2.5
@@ -108,47 +114,54 @@ submissions:
       REPL Interface: 3
       Breaking Logic into Components: 2.5
   Victoria Harrod:
-    repository:
-    notes: ""
+    repository: https://github.com/VikiAnn/mastermind
+    notes: "Had some components that were well thought out.
+            Some of the tests were superficial.
+            Developing a good grasp of OO concepts."
     evaluation:
-      Fundamental Ruby & Style: 0
-      Enumerable & Collections: 0
-      Test-Driven Development: 0
-      REPL Interface: 0
-      Breaking Logic into Components: 0
+      Fundamental Ruby & Style: 2.5
+      Enumerable & Collections: 3
+      Test-Driven Development: 2.5
+      REPL Interface: 3
+      Breaking Logic into Components: 2.5
   Kalah Cheek:
     repository: https://github.com/kcheek/mastermind.git
-    notes: ""
+    notes: "Was able to defend design decisions.
+            Limited test coverage."
     evaluation:
-      Fundamental Ruby & Style: 0
-      Enumerable & Collections: 0
-      Test-Driven Development: 0
-      REPL Interface: 0
-      Breaking Logic into Components: 0
+      Fundamental Ruby & Style: 2.5
+      Enumerable & Collections: 3
+      Test-Driven Development: 2
+      REPL Interface: 3
+      Breaking Logic into Components: 3
   Travis Yoder:
-    repository:
-    notes: ""
-    evaluation:
-      Fundamental Ruby & Style: 0
-      Enumerable & Collections: 0
-      Test-Driven Development: 0
-      REPL Interface: 0
-      Breaking Logic into Components: 0
+    repository: "https://github.com/trayo/mastermind.git"
+    notes: "Some incomplete tests.
+            Several good attempts at trying to split up logical components into
+            individual classes."
+    evaluation:
+      Fundamental Ruby & Style: 3
+      Enumerable & Collections: 3
+      Test-Driven Development: 2
+      REPL Interface: 3
+      Breaking Logic into Components: 3
   Danny Glunz:
     repository:
-    notes: ""
-    evaluation:
-      Fundamental Ruby & Style: 0
-      Enumerable & Collections: 0
-      Test-Driven Development: 0
-      REPL Interface: 0
-      Breaking Logic into Components: 0
+    notes: "Completed both Mastermind and Battleship.
+            Lacking sufficient test coverage."
+    evaluation:
+      Fundamental Ruby & Style: 4
+      Enumerable & Collections: 4
+      Test-Driven Development: 2
+      REPL Interface: 4
+      Breaking Logic into Components: 3.5
   Chandra Carney:
     repository:
-    notes: ""
+    notes: "Lacking test coverage.
+            Good use of enumerable and Ruby style."
     evaluation:
-      Fundamental Ruby & Style: 0
-      Enumerable & Collections: 0
-      Test-Driven Development: 0
-      REPL Interface: 0
-      Breaking Logic into Components: 0
+      Fundamental Ruby & Style: 3
+      Enumerable & Collections: 3
+      Test-Driven Development: 2
+      REPL Interface: 3
+      Breaking Logic into Components: 2.5