You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now, we allow insertion of an input to the probabilistic programming dict happen anywhere within the forecaster workflow. However, developer who wants to extend a new model has no visibility what are the full list of default inputs will be inserted. Same story applied to sampling parameters. I wonder if there is any way to maintain a central all-in-one place to operate all those insertion logics. Meanwhile, we can also maintain a global constants to inform this if necessary.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now, we allow insertion of an input to the probabilistic programming dict happen anywhere within the forecaster workflow. However, developer who wants to extend a new model has no visibility what are the full list of default inputs will be inserted. Same story applied to sampling parameters. I wonder if there is any way to maintain a central all-in-one place to operate all those insertion logics. Meanwhile, we can also maintain a global constants to inform this if necessary.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: