We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Following up on this tweet @pudo @tttp
This Organization ontology seems to have a reasonably simple Industry taxonomy that might be a good minimum interop structure...
Industry Agriculture Farm Ranch Construction Contractor Builder Plumbing Energy Gas Oil Finance Bank Brokerage Food Food_Distribution Food_Wholesale Restaurant Supermarket Food_Production Beverages Insurance Accident Casualty Health Life Property Real_Estate Government County State Country Information Publishing Motion_Picture Sound_Recording Broadcasting Telecommunications Information_Services Manufacture Aerospace Automotive Electronics Mining Retail Apparel Books Catalog Deparment_Store Drugs Electronics Home_Improvement Jewelry Service_Industry Accountancy Advertising Consulting Healthcare Dentist Physician Hospital Legal Transportation Airline Travel_Agency Utilities Warehousing
What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This looks a lot like the OpenSecrets thing, is it the same? What is the benefit of this over one of the official taxonomies, like NAICS/NACE?
Sorry, something went wrong.
No benefit I can see now that I know about NAICS/NACE. Don't know if it's the same as OpenSecrets. Maybe @opensecrets can tell?
ISIC seems to be the UN standard applicable worldwide. (NACE is a derived classification of ISIC)
Here's a query-able database of NACE codes, and a browsable list of ISIC codes
Looks like GoodRelations is interoperable with ISIC and NAICS (not NACE):
There are also rules in NACE (presumably also for ISIC) to determine the principal activity when an organisation has multiple activities:
from https://www.economy.com/support/blog/getfile.asp?did=5E5D88CF-1DEF-4655-8767-ADF01EC463D0&fid=cc033c0c72be4a3e8035a8b459ee0de0.pdf
Refactoring repo to discuss #1 and iilab/openoil#32
4b289ae
No branches or pull requests
Following up on this tweet @pudo @tttp
This Organization ontology seems to have a reasonably simple Industry taxonomy that might be a good minimum interop structure...
What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: