You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In physics.py after calculating the bootstrap current fraction there is a condition to check if the calculated value is greater than bscfmax . If this is true the bootstrap current value is overwritten completely neglecting the model. This will also call the level 2 error number 242 (""PHYSICS: Bootstrap fraction upper limit enforced")
This is a non-physical condition and should be better managed with a new constraint equation as in some cases the bootstrap scaling's give values greater than unity.
Bootstrap fraction (ITER 1989) (bscf_iter89) 0.403 OP
Bootstrap fraction (Sauter et al) (bscf_sauter) 0.994 OP
Bootstrap fraction (Nevins et al) (bscf_nevins) 1.038 OP
Bootstrap fraction (Wilson) (bscf_wilson) 1.090 OP
Bootstrap fraction (bootipf) 0.900 OP
The above is for the output of the st_regression.IN.DAT in this case bscfmax = 0.9 and the Sauter scaling is used.
The difference is a factor of 10% as PROCESS has overridden the value from the model.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In
physics.py
after calculating the bootstrap current fraction there is a condition to check if the calculated value is greater thanbscfmax
. If this is true the bootstrap current value is overwritten completely neglecting the model. This will also call the level 2 error number 242 (""PHYSICS: Bootstrap fraction upper limit enforced")This is a non-physical condition and should be better managed with a new constraint equation as in some cases the bootstrap scaling's give values greater than unity.
The above is for the output of the
st_regression.IN.DAT
in this casebscfmax = 0.9
and the Sauter scaling is used.The difference is a factor of 10% as PROCESS has overridden the value from the model.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: