Hi! Welcome to uutils/coreutils!
Thanks for wanting to contribute to this project! This document explains everything you need to know to contribute. Before you start make sure to also check out these documents:
- Our community's CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md.
- DEVELOPMENT.md for setting up your development environment.
Now follows a very important warning:
Warning
uutils is original code and cannot contain any code from GNU or other implementations. This means that we cannot accept any changes based on the GNU source code. To make sure that cannot happen, you cannot link to the GNU source code either. It is however possible to look at other implementations under a BSD or MIT license like Apple's implementation or OpenBSD.
Finally, feel free to join our Discord!
uutils is a big project consisting of many parts. Here are the most important parts for getting started:
src/uu
: The code for all utilitiessrc/uucore
: Crate containing all the shared code between the utilities.tests/by-util
: The tests for all utilities.src/bin/coreutils.rs
: Code for the multicall binary.docs
: the documentation for the website
Each utility is defined as a separate crate. The structure of each of these crates is as follows:
Cargo.toml
src/main.rs
: contains only a single macro callsrc/<util name>.rs
: the actual code for the utility<util name>.md
: the documentation for the utility
We have separated repositories for crates that we maintain but also publish for use by others:
We have the following goals with our development:
- Compatible: The utilities should be a drop-in replacement for the GNU coreutils.
- Cross-platform: All utilities should run on as many of the supported platforms as possible.
- Reliable: The utilities should never unexpectedly fail.
- Performant: Our utilities should be written in fast idiomatic Rust. We aim to match or exceed the performance of the GNU utilities.
- Well-tested: We should have a lot of tests to be able to guarantee reliability and compatibility.
There are several ways to help and writing code is just one of them. Reporting issues and writing documentation are just as important as writing code.
We can't fix bugs we don't know about, so good issues are super helpful! Here are some tips for writing good issues:
- If you find a bug, make sure it's still a problem on the
main
branch. - Search through the existing issues to see whether it has already been reported.
- Make sure to include all relevant information, such as:
- Which version of uutils did you check?
- Which version of GNU coreutils are you comparing with?
- What platform are you on?
- Provide a way to reliably reproduce the issue.
- Be as specific as possible!
There's never enough documentation. If you come across any documentation that could be improved, feel free to submit a PR for it!
If you want to submit a PR, make sure that you've discussed the solution with the maintainers beforehand. We want to avoid situations where you put a lot of work into a fix that we can't merge! If there's no issue for what you're trying to fix yet, make one before you start working on the PR.
Generally, we try to follow what GNU is doing in terms of options and behavior.
It is recommended to look at the GNU coreutils manual
(on the web,
or locally using info <utility>
). It is more in depth than the man pages and
provides a good description of available features and their implementation
details. But remember, you cannot look at the GNU source code!
Also remember that we can only merge PRs which pass our test suite, follow rustfmt, and do not have any warnings from clippy. See DEVELOPMENT.md for more information. Be sure to also read about our Rust style.
We want uutils to be written in idiomatic Rust, so here are some guidelines to follow. Some of these are aspirational, meaning that we don't do them correctly everywhere in the code. If you find violations of the advice below, feel free to submit a patch!
The coreutils should be very reliable. This means that we should never panic!
.
Therefore, you should avoid using .unwrap()
and panic!
. Sometimes the use of
unreachable!
can be justified with a comment explaining why that code is
unreachable.
We want uutils to be embeddable in other programs. This means that no function
in uutils should exit the program. Doing so would also lead to code with more
confusing control flow. Avoid therefore std::process::exit
and similar
functions which exit the program early.
uutils cannot be entirely safe, because we have to call out to libc
and do
syscalls. However, we still want to limit our use of unsafe
. We generally only
accept unsafe
for FFI, with very few exceptions. Note that performance is very
rarely a valid argument for using unsafe
.
If you still need to write code with unsafe
, make sure to read the
Rustonomicon and annotate the
calls with // SAFETY:
comments explaining why the use of unsafe
is sound.
Macros can be a great tool, but they are also usually hard to understand. They should be used sparingly. Make sure to explore simpler options before you reach for a solution involving macros.
Rust has many string-like types, and sometimes it's hard to choose the right
one. It's tempting to use str
(and String
) for everything, but that is not
always the right choice for uutils, because we need to support invalid UTF-8,
just like the GNU coreutils. For example, paths on Linux might not be valid
UTF-8! Whenever we are dealing with paths, we should therefore stick with
OsStr
and Path
. Make sure that you only convert to str
/String
if you
know that something is always valid UTF-8. If you need more operations on
OsStr
, you can use the bstr
crate.
We use rustdoc for our documentation, so it's best to follow rustdoc's guidelines. Make sure that your documentation is not just repeating the name of the function, but actually giving more useful information. Rustdoc recommends the following structure:
[short sentence explaining what it is]
[more detailed explanation]
[at least one code example that users can copy/paste to try it]
[even more advanced explanations if necessary]
Comments should be written to explain the code, not to describe the code. Try to focus on explaining why the code is the way it is. If you feel like you have to describe the code, that's usually a sign that you could improve the naming of variables and functions.
If you edit a piece of code, make sure to update any comments that need to change as a result. The only thing worse than having no comments is having outdated comments!
To ensure easy collaboration, we have guidelines for using Git and GitHub.
- Make small and atomic commits.
- Keep a clean history of commits.
- Write informative commit messages.
- Annotate your commit message with the component you're editing. For example:
cp: do not overwrite on with -i
oruucore: add support for FreeBSD
. - Do not unnecessarily move items around in the code. This makes the changes much harder to review. If you do need to move things around, do that in a separate commit.
You can read this section in the Git book to learn how to write good commit messages.
In addition, here are a few examples for a summary line when committing to uutils:
- commit for a single utility
nohup: cleanup and refactor
- commit for a utility's tests
tests/rm: test new feature
Beyond changes to an individual utility or its tests, other summary lines for non-utility modules include:
README: add help
uucore: add new modules
uutils: add new utility
gitignore: add temporary files
- Make the titles of PRs descriptive.
- This means describing the problem you solve. For example, do not write
Fix #1234
, butls: fix version sort order
. - You can prefix the title with the utility the PR concerns.
- This means describing the problem you solve. For example, do not write
- Keep PRs small and self-contained. A set of small PRs is much more likely to get merged quickly than one large PR.
- Make sure the CI passes (up to intermittently failing tests).
- You know your code best, that's why it's best if you can solve merge conflicts
on your branch yourself.
- It's up to you whether you want to use
git merge main
orgit rebase main
. - Feel free to ask for help with merge conflicts.
- It's up to you whether you want to use
- You do not need to ping maintainers to request a review, but it's fine to do so if you don't get a response within a few days.
We take pride in supporting many operating systems and architectures. Any code
you contribute must at least compile without warnings for all platforms in the
CI. However, you can use #[cfg(...)]
attributes to create platform dependent
features.
Tip: For Windows, Microsoft provides some images (VMWare, Hyper-V, VirtualBox and Parallels) for development here.
Please make sure you have installed GNU utils and prerequisites and can execute commands described in Comparing with GNU section of DEVELOPMENT.md
The Python script ./util/remaining-gnu-error.py
shows the list of failing
tests in the CI.
To improve the GNU compatibility, the following process is recommended:
- Identify a test (the smaller, the better) on a program that you understand or
is easy to understand. You can use the
./util/remaining-gnu-error.py
script to help with this decision. - Build both the GNU and Rust coreutils using:
bash util/build-gnu.sh
- Run the test with
bash util/run-gnu-test.sh <your test>
- Start to modify
<your test>
to understand what is wrong. Examples:- Add
set -v
to have the bash verbose mode - Add
echo $?
where needed - When the variable
fail
is used in the test,echo $fail
to see when the test started to fail - Bump the content of the output (ex:
cat err
) - ...
- Add
- Or, if the test is simple, extract the relevant information to create a new test case running both GNU & Rust implementation
- Start to modify the Rust implementation to match the expected behavior
- Add a test to make sure that we don't regress (our test suite is super quick)
To generate code coverage report locally please follow Code coverage report section of DEVELOPMENT.md
The Coreutils have different implementations, with different levels of completions:
However, when reimplementing the tools/options in Rust, don't read their source codes when they are using reciprocal licenses (ex: GNU GPL, GNU LGPL, etc).
uutils is distributed under the terms of the MIT License; see the LICENSE
file
for details. This is a permissive license, which allows the software to be used
with few restrictions.
Copyrights in the uutils project are retained by their contributors, and no copyright assignment is required to contribute.
If you wish to add or change dependencies as part of a contribution to the
project, a tool like cargo-license
can be used to show their license details.
The following types of license are acceptable:
- MIT License
- Dual- or tri-license with an MIT License option ("Apache-2.0 or MIT" is a popular combination)
- "MIT equivalent" license (2-clause BSD, 3-clause BSD, ISC)
- License less restrictive than the MIT License (CC0 1.0 Universal)
- Apache License version 2.0
Licenses we will not use:
- An ambiguous license, or no license
- Strongly reciprocal licenses (GNU GPL, GNU LGPL)
If you wish to add a reference but it doesn't meet these requirements, please raise an issue to describe the dependency.