You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Commit 61e89b7
Browse filesBrowse the repository at this point in the historyBrowse files
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/aerodromes/classc/Melbourne.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ If winds are too great, single runway operations may be necessary (eg, Runway 16
33
33
| 09A/16D | 09 | 16 |
34
34
35
35
!!! information
36
-
When utilising the 27AD/34D runway mode, heavy aircraft may require Runway 34 for departure (Due to the length of Runway 27). It may also be more operationally efficient to assign Runway 34 to aircraft taxiing from the southern apron.
36
+
When utilising the 27AD/34D runway mode, Heavy Aircraft may require Runway 34 for departure due to the shorter length of Runway 27. Assigning Runway 34 to aircraft from the southern apron can also improve aerodrome efficiency due to the reduced taxi distance.
37
37
38
38
!!! note
39
39
See [Runway Mode Formatting](#runway-mode-formatting) for details on how to format each runway mode in the ATIS.
0 commit comments