Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Addition of Class D Secondary Tower Positions (AIRAC 2412) #406

Open
Slep-wt opened this issue Dec 15, 2024 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #414
Open

Addition of Class D Secondary Tower Positions (AIRAC 2412) #406

Slep-wt opened this issue Dec 15, 2024 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #414
Assignees
Labels
airac Issue associated with upcoming/past changes to AIRAC data low priority

Comments

@Slep-wt
Copy link
Contributor

Slep-wt commented Dec 15, 2024

Per AIRAC 2412, the following positions have been added:

  • MB-2_TWR
  • AF-2_TWR
  • PF-2_TWR
  • JT-2_TWR
  • TW-S_TWR
@Slep-wt Slep-wt added airac Issue associated with upcoming/past changes to AIRAC data low priority labels Dec 15, 2024
@alphadelta332
Copy link
Collaborator

Any particular reason why TW is a south split, but the rest are a 2 split?

Would it be better to have these consistent with the formatting of other tower splits (ie a cardinal direction)?

@Slep-wt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Slep-wt commented Dec 15, 2024

Mainly because Tamworth ADC2 is explicitly responsible only for the southern runway, whilst the other metro D's have different runway responsibilities. So its hard to assign a cardinal direction to them.

@alphadelta332
Copy link
Collaborator

Mainly because Tamworth ADC2 is explicitly responsible only for the southern runway, whilst the other metro D's have different runway responsibilities. So its hard to assign a cardinal direction to them.

Yeah gotcha.

Thoughts on changing YMMB to be an East/West split? That's how it's always been described in flying procedures there, including the CASA documentation. Whether it's 17/35 or 13/31, it's more or less an east/west split anyway.

The other airports are fair enough

@mattkelly4
Copy link
Collaborator

@Slep-wt Are we doing YSBK as well?

@Slep-wt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Slep-wt commented Dec 18, 2024

Yep, forgot to add it @mattkelly4

@alphadelta332 alphadelta332 linked a pull request Dec 20, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
airac Issue associated with upcoming/past changes to AIRAC data low priority
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants