You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If an aircraft requests an oceanic clearance as a RR, rather than selecting the appropriate oceanic track (this actually happens much more frequently than one would think), and provides a random routing which exactly matches the routing of an established NAT Track, efforts should be made to change them from a RR request to a track-based request. This could be done in multiple ways:
Reject the pilot's attempt to request clearance, and show a helpful message to the effect of hey, stupid! your routing exactly matches Track P. Please refile your request and select Track P, not RR.
Silently change the pilot's request from a RR request to the appropriate track based request. It appears to the controller and pilot as a track-based request.
Personally I can see the value in both. However, rejecting with the message may be a better solution, since it (a) educates the pilot on their mistake, and (b) is likely to be a bit less work than the latter solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If an aircraft requests an oceanic clearance as a RR, rather than selecting the appropriate oceanic track (this actually happens much more frequently than one would think), and provides a random routing which exactly matches the routing of an established NAT Track, efforts should be made to change them from a RR request to a track-based request. This could be done in multiple ways:
hey, stupid! your routing exactly matches Track P. Please refile your request and select Track P, not RR.
Personally I can see the value in both. However, rejecting with the message may be a better solution, since it (a) educates the pilot on their mistake, and (b) is likely to be a bit less work than the latter solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: