Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider if migrating to tower-sessions is appropriate #1

Open
maxcountryman opened this issue Oct 6, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Consider if migrating to tower-sessions is appropriate #1

maxcountryman opened this issue Oct 6, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@maxcountryman
Copy link

Hi folks,

I'm the author of axum-sessions, which is a crate I see you all are using--I'm glad to see you've found it useful!

Over the course of the last year or so we've hit some roadblocks with our key dependency, async-session. The long and short of that is in order to unblock that and address some problems with axum-sessions's design, we've released a new crate which aims to replace axum-sessions: tower-sessions.

tower-sessions no longer relies on a third-party crate for its session implementation and this has allowed us to change its design to better fit tower and the broader tower ecosystem (i.e. axum). For instance, we no longer need writable and readable sessions, and have simplified the interface as a result.

I'd be curious if there's interest in migrating and am happy to help if so.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant