Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider implementing RFC 9535 #58

Open
glyn opened this issue Feb 23, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Consider implementing RFC 9535 #58

glyn opened this issue Feb 23, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@glyn
Copy link
Contributor

glyn commented Feb 23, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

IETF RFC 9535 defines a proposed standard for JSONPath. Other resources:

  • A partial Compliance Test Suite.
  • Behaviours of various implementations can be checked in the comparison project. Please note that the JSONPath Reference Implementation referenced in the comparison project is stalled/archived and incomplete.
  • At the time of writing, online sandboxes for RFC 9535 are available in C# and in Rust.
  • For more background and comments on the status of the CTS and RI, see this this post (also here in the IETF blog).
  • Public discussion occurs in the IETF JSONPath Working Group's mailing list (archive).

(See here for updates to this list of resources.)

Describe the solution you'd like

Valid approaches for this project are to (a) implement the RFC in whole or in part, (b) document its behaviour relative to the RFC, and (c) do nothing.

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response

@glyn glyn added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 23, 2024
@daveshanley
Copy link

Please consider this :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants