You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This document will focus on the process of taking an ML/DS model, making the code robust and maintainable, and preparing it to deploy to production. One of our key recommendations: the data scientist role is no different from the designer or product manager role. If we are prepared to argue for blended teams, cross-discipline pairing, short delivery cycles, and iterative development, then we should be proposing to embed data scientists into every project that needs them. We also argue for changes to the workflow around unit testing, TDD, and refactoring.
Summary of audiences
Delivery leads, sales, anchors, anyone involved in proposing staffing levels for projects and setting the terms of engagement on a project. These people should be ready to educate our clients about the advantages of embedding data science workflows right into projects early and often.
Level of content
Level of content as it pertains to the topic proposed. Delete those not applicable.
If contributing via Google Docs: I have added a link to my document to this issue, and set the document's Share settings to "Anyone on the internet with this link can comment".
The front matter (metadata) is filled out completely (e.g. description, topics, tags, author, etc - as appropriate for the content type). See Drafting Content
My content has been reviewed by my team for technical accuracy. See Editing Content
My content has beed reviewed and edited by a copy editor. See Editing Content
If applicable: My content has gone through a legal review (VMware Employees Only). See Editing Content
If applicable: I have tested my content locally and everything passes. See Testing Content
Ensure the front matter is filled out correctly and completely.
If applicable: Review additions to custom_dict.txt.
Ensure with the author they have reviewed the staging site for correctness. The reviewer should review this too.
If applicable: Review any new Team pages.
Optional: Ensure the author has provided copy for Social Media distribution.\
If contributing via Google Docs: Send the staging link to the author to review. The reviewer should review this too. Get the final 👍 from the author to push the content public.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Summary of content
This document will focus on the process of taking an ML/DS model, making the code robust and maintainable, and preparing it to deploy to production. One of our key recommendations: the data scientist role is no different from the designer or product manager role. If we are prepared to argue for blended teams, cross-discipline pairing, short delivery cycles, and iterative development, then we should be proposing to embed data scientists into every project that needs them. We also argue for changes to the workflow around unit testing, TDD, and refactoring.
Summary of audiences
Delivery leads, sales, anchors, anyone involved in proposing staffing levels for projects and setting the terms of engagement on a project. These people should be ready to educate our clients about the advantages of embedding data science workflows right into projects early and often.
Level of content
Level of content as it pertains to the topic proposed. Delete those not applicable.
Draft of Content
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LjNmqLaruSz9cSyfMfkdfpH0jb78jZMMjUmZ9JWIWLc/edit?usp=sharing
Contributor Checklist
Reviewer Checklist
custom_dict.txt
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: