You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Merge request #192 has introduced a new command to check new files that would be created on filesystem upon package installation. It would, however, be a bit cleaner, if instead of looking at the filesystem, we would look at the contents of the old package and report a pure diff from it. Thus disregarding that the user might have done with their local filesystem.
The feature request is to improve the currently existing command to look at old package contents (can be easily done with a single pacman command) and compare with the new contents we already have in code at that point.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
libalpm allowed dynamically linking to libalpm,
the underlying system library for pacman.
This allowed interfacing with the pacman internal database
at potentially much higher speed.
However, this also causes `rua` to break if libalpm's ABI changes.
The simpler alternative of just querying `pacman` and asking
the required data seems to work quite well over the last 1-2 years.
This commit removes support for the old approach and leaves
just 1 alternative for simplicity and stability.
This also allows adding new features faster,
see e.g. #196
Merge request #192 has introduced a new command to check new files that would be created on filesystem upon package installation. It would, however, be a bit cleaner, if instead of looking at the filesystem, we would look at the contents of the old package and report a pure diff from it. Thus disregarding that the user might have done with their local filesystem.
The feature request is to improve the currently existing command to look at old package contents (can be easily done with a single
pacman
command) and compare with the new contents we already have in code at that point.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: