Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for LMTP #67

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 30, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Add support for LMTP #67

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 30, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Contributor

I suspect supporting LMTP would be as simple as recognizing the LHLO command as 
an alias for HELO. 

Is this something that can be done as an API consumer, or would it require a 
modification to subethasmtp? If it's the latter, I would be happy to attempt to 
write a patch if someone could give me a few pointers about where to get 
started.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 27 Jul 2013 at 7:03

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Contributor Author

Alright, so I added really naive LHLO support (it is just treated as ELHO 
without any other LMTP considerations) with an attached patch.

Original comment by [email protected] on 28 Jul 2013 at 1:15

  • Added labels: ****
  • Removed labels: ****

Attachments:

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Contributor Author

I made an attempt more than a year ago. It's not just supporting LHLO, you also 
need to add some methods to the MessageHandler to register delivery attempts.

I attach a file with my source code. It was meant to be part of a MongoDB 
backed mail store. This is the github project: 
https://github.com/jglatre/mitote-store, now abandoned.

I hope it helps :)

Original comment by [email protected] on 28 Jul 2013 at 11:53

  • Added labels: ****
  • Removed labels: ****

Attachments:

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Contributor Author

Original comment by [email protected] on 14 Oct 2013 at 1:16

  • Added labels: Type-Enhancement
  • Removed labels: Type-Defect

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant