Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test question #65

Open
gao123qiang opened this issue Jan 15, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

test question #65

gao123qiang opened this issue Jan 15, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@gao123qiang
Copy link

  1. I observed that when the scene changes greatly, the repair results are better, but when the scene changes little, there maybe have artifacts in the repair results. How to deal with them? Can you give some suggestions

  2. I don't know how these command parameters affect the results?

@gaochen315
Copy link
Member

  1. When you say "the scene changes greatly", do you mean the camera motion is large, or the objects in the scene have a large motion?

Camera motion: if the camera is barely moved, we do not have a lot to propagate. The completion quality mainly depends on single image inpainting, and the result could be bad.
object motion: If the object moves too fast, RAFT may fail due to rapid motion. And the propagation quality will be degraded.

  1. If you want to remove objects or inpaint the missing region, use --mode object_removal. Use --mode video_extrapolation for extrapolation. --seamless will give you seamless results but it requires a longer processing time.

@gao123qiang
Copy link
Author

gao123qiang commented Jan 18, 2022

@gaochen315
what i mean is the Camera motion, the result likes you said,
i notice the single image inpaint is too old, do you plan to update it with v2 or other ? now i try to add a new method: CTSDG to inpaint image , it will be over,
1, can you give me some advises where i should pay attention to ?
2, can you share me about the args: edge_guide,Nonlocal, alternate_corr, mixed_precision and consistencyThres, how to affect the results ? i have tested it with different style, but i found less change in result.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants