This issue is to discuss adding minimal support for Triple Terms in RDF/XML, using parseType="Triple".

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
            xmlns:ex="http://example.org/stuff/1.0/"
            xml:base="http://example.org/triples/">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/">
    <ex:prop rdf:parseType="Triple">
      <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/stuff/1.0/s">
        <ex:p rdf:resource="http://example.org/stuff/1.0/o" />
      </rdf:Description>
    </ex:prop>
  </rdf:Description>

</rdf:RDF>

Wording and/or parser state will need to be described to prevent nested statements under the triple term.

Potential syntax for reifiers could be considered separately.

Note that there are a number of different ways to specify a triple in RDF/XML, any of which should work once embedded in parseType="Triple".

Note that this should not represent any compatibility issues, as parseType values are controlled by the spec. But, we may want to signal that the spec version is 1.2 somehow.