Missing term in the vcdm spec

[iherman]

As reported in #1209, the serviceEndpoint term, though present in the vocabulary, does not have a formal specification in the VCDM specification (nor in the DID specification, although it has been suggested that this may be a DID related term).

[brentzundel]

The definition I know of is here: https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/#service-endpoints

[iherman]

I am happy to use that URL and be over with it, but it is a little bit strange to see this term in this vocabulary.

However, this is a layman's reaction. If there is an agreement to use that, I will make a PR for this.

cc @msporny @dlongley

[iherman]

Note #1230. If that PR is accepted and merged, it makes this issue moot, ie, can be closed.

[msporny]

As @brentzundel noted above... this is how we defined service and serviceEndpoint in DID Core... which shows that both of those terms are defined in the DID Core vocabulary, not the security vocabulary.

    "service": {
      "@id": "https://www.w3.org/ns/did#service",
      "@type": "@id",
      "@context": {
        "@protected": true,
        "id": "@id",
        "type": "@type",
        "serviceEndpoint": {
          "@id": "https://www.w3.org/ns/did#serviceEndpoint",
          "@type": "@id"
        }
      }
    },

IOW, I think we can close this issue because service and serviceEndpoint isn't defined by the security vocabulary.

[iherman]

IOW, I think we can close this issue because service and serviceEndpoint isn't defined by the security vocabulary.

Which means merging #1230 ...

[iherman]

#1230 has been merged, I will close this comment.