You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A single derived proof value object is produced as output, which contains a set of six or seven elements, having the names "bbsProof", "labelMap", "mandatoryIndexes", "selectiveIndexes", "presentationHeader", "featureOption", and, depending on the value of the featureOption parameter, "pseudonym" and/or "lengthBBSMessages".
— is internally inconsistent (the set may have six, seven, or eight elements) and it disagrees with the last paragraph of that algorithm (again, should say "six, seven, or eight elements" including "featureOption", "pseudonym" and/or "lengthBBSMessages") —
Return derived proof value as an object with properties set to the five, six, or seven elements, using the names "bbsProof", "labelMap", "mandatoryIndexes", "selectiveIndexes", "presentationHeader", and optional "pseudonym" and/or "lengthBBSMessages", respectively. In addition, add featureOption and its value to the object.
These should be brought into agreement. Whatever the result is, it should then be applied to this part of the test suite.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Originally posted by @TallTed in #63 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: