-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A commandlet for identifying Variable ID conflicts on the merge process? #11
Comments
Well .. it is quite complicated to get the variable id's out - let alone compare them (in the same context) and report duplicates.. . The best thing I have come up with to handle this is to import all objects file-by-file. So in stead of a joined file, I split the result , and import all files (with a loop). It takes longer, but it reports all errors per object.. . Not ideal, I know.. . but I haven't been able to put time in what you requested .. |
How do you import all the objects with a loop ? can you help me about this ? |
Well, use Split-NAVApplicationObject to split the files. Then, import them one-by-one by looping the files, like: Something like that... |
Other notes:
|
Arrgh, and what I was going to say:
|
Howdo you know which ID's are completely unused ones"? As such, I'd rather say change them to your range.. . Very true with the UIDOffSet. I have a function for that :-) |
I was thinking of the second time you have to do it where moving from |
Hello, i am getting so much variable conflicts during merges. The bad thing about this is, the conflicts being problem on the Import process. For example, when the first conflict is on %85 then i am getting the error after 15 min import process. I resolve the issue, then import again. If there is another conflict ie %88, then i have to import whole objects again in order to see another conflict. It is very time consuming process and very unproductive way to resolve a simple problem.
I wonder is there a way to identfy those conflicts before import the merged object file ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: