Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is this project still active? #212

Open
gpalsingh opened this issue Feb 5, 2023 · 13 comments
Open

Is this project still active? #212

gpalsingh opened this issue Feb 5, 2023 · 13 comments

Comments

@gpalsingh
Copy link

Hi, I was just wondering if the project is still active and if there are any plans for future development

@wclr
Copy link
Owner

wclr commented Feb 6, 2023

What development? What features are you lacking?

@JordanAdams
Copy link

JordanAdams commented Feb 13, 2023

What development? What features are you lacking?

I suspect this question arose from there being a number of open issues and PRs with little movement. I'm certainly not one to suggest that open source developers have any obligation to maintain or continuously work on their projects; however it's a totally fair to question to ask if the project is still active.

@wclr
Copy link
Owner

wclr commented Feb 14, 2023

@JordanAdams Do you have anything concrete to say, are there any issues you are waiting to be addressed?

Answering the question Is this project still active, yes it is.

@JordanAdams
Copy link

@wclr Not really sure why you have such a defensive response to a simple observation, particularly when I was defending you. But thank for you for the clarification ❤️

@wclr
Copy link
Owner

wclr commented Feb 16, 2023

@wclr Not really sure why you have such a defensive response to a simple observation, particularly when I was defending you. But thank for you for the clarification ❤️

Ha, sorry, I've missread your message. 🤝

@quantuminformation
Copy link

@wclr I wonder if we still need yalc, given that pnpm link will work on windows computers using the linux subsystem (WSL)?

@wclr
Copy link
Owner

wclr commented Mar 18, 2023

@quantuminformation I don't know if you need it or no, I use yalc to avoid cross projects symlinks while making a package accessible to multiple dependants in more stable manner.

@jkhartshorne
Copy link

I was wondering the same thing and for the same reason (lots of open PRs). Glad to know it is being maintained, since I use it! I was worried I needed to migrate to something else.

@stellarhoof
Copy link

@wclr Perhaps you can designate someone to help merging PRs and resolve issues. As it is, there are outstanding bugs that will probably never get resolved.

@coopbri
Copy link

coopbri commented Aug 8, 2023

Hi everyone, I decided to create an active fork of this project (called "knit") to breathe some new life into it.

Still getting a feel for the codebase, but so far I revamped the CI, updated the documentation, upgraded the dependencies, and some other minor updates.

@Nantris
Copy link

Nantris commented Oct 13, 2023

I'd love to have auto-push functionality but it seems like that idea was shut down because we can use nodemon, but that's a pain compared to having a more out-of-the-box approach.

That's the only additional feature I'd like to see. @wclr and @coopbri. Then yalc would offer the workflow of yarn link with the benefits of yalc.

@coopbri
Copy link

coopbri commented Oct 13, 2023

I'd love to have auto-push functionality but it seems like that idea was shut down because we can use nodemon, but that's a pain compared to having a more out-of-the-box approach.

That's the only additional feature I'd like to see. @wclr and @coopbri. Then yalc would offer the workflow of yarn link with the benefits of yalc.

What about yalc/knit publish? Does that suit your needs?

@Nantris
Copy link

Nantris commented Oct 13, 2023

I don't mind needing to run the publish command once - it's the problem of running a command whenever I make a change that's troublesome for me. The promised workflow of yarn link is what I'm after, at least as close to it as possible.

The use case is that we have two packages outside of a monorepo which we're working to integrate and it involves expanding the API on one project and using it on the other. Needing to run to the terminal in-between editing files does not bring joy.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants