Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fine grained typography control #873

Open
stubbornella opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Fine grained typography control #873

stubbornella opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
focus-area-proposal Focus Area Proposal

Comments

@stubbornella
Copy link

stubbornella commented Oct 9, 2024

Description

Developers would like to remove the vertical space appearing above and below text glyphs, allowing more precise positioning and alignment. And also, to allow the container to trim the margins of its children where they adjoin the container's edges.
This proposal includes text-box-trim, text-box-edge, margin-trim, hanging punctuation, text-decoration shorthand, word-break, line-break, sideways-lr + sideways-rl, text-wrap-mode + text-wrap: stable + text-wrap-style.

Specification

https://drafts.csswg.org/css-box-4/#margin-trim

Additional Signals

No response

@meyerweb
Copy link

Supersets #730 and #781, possibly others.

@meyerweb
Copy link

Also supersets #814, possibly #832.

@jgraham
Copy link
Contributor

jgraham commented Oct 15, 2024

Given that the process allow combining multiple proposals into one focus area would it be possible to restrict this proposal to anything that isn't in one of the other focus areas Eric identified?

@stubbornella
Copy link
Author

This was a proposal for a focus area rather than individual properties, I think it could be good to have this be the umbrella, but I'm open to other solutions.

@meyerweb
Copy link

This was a proposal for a focus area rather than individual properties, I think it could be good to have this be the umbrella, but I'm open to other solutions.

Ah! Having this as an umbrella/bucket/group does make sense, and I support the idea. My apologies; both the individual things and the groups are tagged 'focus-area-proposal' so I didn’t pick up the distinction here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
focus-area-proposal Focus Area Proposal
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants