Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Java file manager #628

Closed
campones opened this issue Jan 3, 2017 · 13 comments
Closed

Java file manager #628

campones opened this issue Jan 3, 2017 · 13 comments

Comments

@campones
Copy link

campones commented Jan 3, 2017

Hello

I have webmin installed on ubuntu 16.0.4 lts (32bits if it matters).

I enjoy the java file manager because mostly, it offers a tree of directories, which the html one doesn't.

So since Chrome blocked java plugin, I m loading the java manager using a chrome plugin.
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ie-tab/hehijbfgiekmjfkfjpbkbammjbdenadd
it basically load IE engine into chrome.

With webmin default theme, it works fine (in fact it works as it used to work before chrome ended support for java plugin), but with your theme, it cannot load properly.

@iliajie
Copy link
Collaborator

iliajie commented Jan 3, 2017

Hi,

The problem is not in the theme but in the plug-in itself. It works in Firefox and IE as designed. Chrome had reasons for dropping support for it.

Version of the theme 18.31 has better feature than tree-view, from my point of view. You can see it in action in the following video-screencast.

P.S. Just a guess but maybe opening it in the separate tab will make it work for you

@iliajie iliajie closed this as completed Jan 3, 2017
@campones
Copy link
Author

campones commented Jan 3, 2017

ok but however, it works totally fine with webmin default theme!

@campones
Copy link
Author

campones commented Jan 3, 2017

yes it works if I write the full url in the browser but then I lose the theme and it looks really terrible

https://i.gyazo.com/c85b8de9a7bab6cb1da8c66a4fb5dfa1.png

same plugin and default theme
https://i.gyazo.com/bb7ff5ff5bbce23f5f556cc1fc611209.png

@iliajie
Copy link
Collaborator

iliajie commented Jan 3, 2017

What error in the console you get when loading Java FM in Authentic Theme?

@iliajie
Copy link
Collaborator

iliajie commented Jan 3, 2017

Did you try Firefox?

@campones
Copy link
Author

campones commented Jan 3, 2017

no I didn't. trying now firefox, java isn't working either.

working fine on IE (without the chrome extension then).

on chrome, when I try to load the java FM , using the plugin, I get this

https://i.gyazo.com/3ee6f8ff0f4f44a218ece7ebf0bd311e.png

that's weird, but I guess I' ll stick to the default theme.

Thanks

@iliajie
Copy link
Collaborator

iliajie commented Jan 3, 2017

Just reload the page and clear cache. What is the error in the console of Chrome? (Call it using F12). Firefox works fine actually checked it fee hours ago.

@iliajie
Copy link
Collaborator

iliajie commented Jan 3, 2017

What you're describing has everything to do with your setup, as I see it at the moment.

@iliajie
Copy link
Collaborator

iliajie commented Jan 5, 2017

I have made a patch that should completely exclude all theme scripts for Java File Manager. When 18.32 is out. Please upgrade and try again.

@campones
Copy link
Author

campones commented Jan 5, 2017

Ok thanks, I will

@iliajie
Copy link
Collaborator

iliajie commented Jan 5, 2017

It's out. Have a look.

@campones
Copy link
Author

campones commented Jan 5, 2017

thanks, I upgraded.

but it isn't working for me with that chrome plugin (that allows me to run java).

only way to have it loading is if I insert the "file" in the url like in "https://192.168.1.1:10000/file/ but then I lose all webmin interface

@iliajie
Copy link
Collaborator

iliajie commented Jan 5, 2017

I see. My friend, it's not the theme issue. I wish I could help but I'm afraid I can't.

I truly recommend to try using non-Java File Manager and report on what is missing. Eventually it will have more features that Java one. Tell me if there is anything else that is missing but tree-view, as you commented on #629.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants