Skip to content

[In 78] shouldn't be [Ingalls 78]? #33

@rezahsnz

Description

@rezahsnz

There is no [In 78] entry in either of scanned documents' references section while text cites this work of Dan. I think this should be changed to [Ingalls 78]. Citation appears at the last paragraph of "THE FIRST MODERN SMALLTALK(-76), ITS BIRTH, APPLICATIONS, AND IMPROVEMENTS" section.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions