Under the Hood JSON should include post IDs for labeled posts

[Motyst]

Problem

The Under the Hood monthly JSON only reports aggregate counts for visibility labels. It does not include the post IDs or URLs that received those labels.

Example from a July 2026 report:

• postCount: 982
• NSFW_HIGH_RECALL: 16 posts (1.62%)
• account label NsfwHighRecall: 16 / 31 days

There is no list of which 16 posts were labeled, so the account owner cannot review or appeal the specific posts.

Why this matters

The tool is meant to show which labels affect visibility. Counts alone are not enough to:

• inspect the flagged media
• appeal a wrong NSFW_HIGH_RECALL label
• change future content to avoid the account-level NsfwHighRecall tag

Request

Please add labeled post identifiers to the JSON, for example:

"postLabels": [
{
"label": "NSFW_HIGH_RECALL",
"posts": "16",
"postIds": ["123...", "456..."]
}
]

Even tweet IDs without extra metadata would make the report usable.

Code area: under-the-hood/
Tool: https://x.com/i/under_the_hood

[arquieta88-art]

I strongly support this.

From an adult creator perspective, aggregate counts are useful for knowing that a visibility problem exists, but not for understanding or correcting it.

If a report says that several posts received NSFW_HIGH_RECALL, but does not identify those posts, the creator cannot determine whether the label came from explicit media, text, a thumbnail, a false positive, or even content that was voluntarily marked as sensitive.

That makes it very difficult to learn from the report or change future publishing behavior.

This becomes even more important when post-level labels may contribute to account-level restrictions that affect discovery. If a label can materially affect distribution, creators should be able to see which specific content generated that signal.

Post IDs alone would already be a major improvement. Ideally, the report could eventually also expose the label source or provenance when available (author-applied, automated, report-based, etc.).

Transparency is most useful when it is actionable.