Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Espurna + Blynk server #559

Open
artemicruz opened this issue Feb 13, 2018 · 12 comments
Open

Espurna + Blynk server #559

artemicruz opened this issue Feb 13, 2018 · 12 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@artemicruz
Copy link

It would be wonderful to add blynk server connection.
add blynk libraries are open source
the user only needs: server, port and tocken (online or private)

http://docs.blynk.cc/#hardware-set-ups-esp8266-standalone

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 13, 2018

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jun 13, 2018
@xoseperez xoseperez added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 13, 2018
@stale stale bot removed the stale label Jun 13, 2018
@thaeger71
Copy link

Is someone working on this this ? Otherwise I would start to work on it .... but just for case there is already something, I would offer my help.

@xoseperez
Copy link
Owner

There is no active development on this, at least not in the main repo.

@thaeger71
Copy link

Hey guys,

I forked the master branch and implented Blynk support. How is the correct way to get it into the regular branch ? Do I have to make a pull request ?

@mcspr
Copy link
Collaborator

mcspr commented Sep 26, 2018

@thaeger71 hey. please rebase it on 'dev' and you can open up a pr
-> https://github.com/xoseperez/espurna/wiki/PullRequests

edit and you can avoid adding gulp output

@xoseperez
Copy link
Owner

The code looks mostly OK. I have not tested it yet. But I would not enable Blynk by default unless someone points out a very good reason to do it.

@thaeger71
Copy link

thaeger71 commented Oct 9, 2018 via email

@bluexp1
Copy link

bluexp1 commented Feb 16, 2019

Isn't there any plan to release this feature?

@thaeger71
Copy link

It's a good question, I mean Max made also some effort to optimze things, now everthing seems to work, but so far I know there is no feedback from Xose on this so far ....

@mcspr
Copy link
Collaborator

mcspr commented Feb 21, 2019

Yep. #1230 PR is still pending (+ maybe needs another thought about wiring more things... and how that wiring is happening)
I have not used it very much though.

@thaeger71
Copy link

I marked everything pending as solved regarding #1230 is there something I have to in addition from my side ?

@xoseperez
Copy link
Owner

I'm going to release 1.13.4 first and then merge the code into dev.

@xoseperez xoseperez added this to the 1.14.0 milestone Feb 21, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants