Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
170 lines (146 loc) · 10.9 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

170 lines (146 loc) · 10.9 KB
Raw

GraphQL, Spring WebFlux, DataLoader, JOOQ

This is a sample application written in Kotlin that uses the following technologies:

This was originally forked from https://github.com/geowarin/graphql-webflux and has been expanded to:

  • Add support for data caching/batching using DataLoader
  • Add some custom functionality related to adding database joins based on requested GraphQL fields.
  • Show how data can be fetched from an underlying Postgres database using a combination of jOOQ and reactive-pg-client.
  • Show how Kotlin coroutines can be used throughout, wrapped in CompletableFutures only at the very top level where the GraphQL libraries need them (i.e. in the GraphQL resolvers).

The application shows how a GraphQL endpoint can be exposed using Spring WebFlux, in a Spring Boot application. GraphQL requests are handled in a non-blocking way (with non-blocking database access being supplied by the reactive-pg-client libraries).

As well as GraphQL, DataLoader is used to prevent the N+1 problem.

And as explained further down, an enhancement to the default DataLoader functionality is also included, attempting to solve (in a much more simplified and cut down way) what Join Monster does in a JavaScript environment, namely adding joins to database queries based on what GraphQL fields are requested.

Instructions

(Please note the Pre-Requisites section first.)

  1. Follow the instructions in the readme in the Docker folder to bring up a Docker container with Postgres installed, and a sample database created in it.
  2. Load the project into your IDE (I'm using IntelliJ) and run the GraphQLApplication class. This will start a Spring Boot application serving GraphQL requests.
  3. Open localhost:8080 in your browser. You will see the GraphiQL explorer. There you can start making GraphQL calls.
  4. On the very first run, you'll need to create some sample data in your database. Do this by issuing the following GraphQL request: 
    mutation { 
  createTestData
}
  5. Once you have done that, you'll be able to start querying that information, e.g. by making a call such as: 
    {
  customers {
    id
    firstName
    lastName
    company {
      id
      name
      address
    }
  }
}

Project Structure

This project is structured as follows:

  • The entry point is a handler for HTTP requests to the /graphql endpoint. This is defined in the GraphQLRoutes class. The handler delegates the handling of individual requests to one of the...
  • GraphQL resolvers: These are defined in the resolvers package. In here the Query class has one method for each query defined in the GraphQL schema (/resources/schema.graphqls). Each of these delegate the call onto one of the..
  • Services: There is one service for each of the entities (AKA domain model objects) in the system. These are found in the services package. Each of these make a call to a repository from the...
  • Data Access Layer: This package contains all the repositories, responsible for fetching data from the underlying database. These are all found in the dataacess package.

Once an entity has been returned from the service to the GraphQL components, it might be ready to return to the client. However there are cases where the GraphQL schema describes an object as having a property (a GraphQL field) which doesn't directly correlate to one of the properties on the entity: it might need to be fetched separately. For example, say there is a Customer entity, with a related Company entity. And say that the Customer entity has a property called companyId, which only exposes the ID of the company, not the whole Company object. The GraphQL schema might define that its Customer type does have a property called "company", which returns a full Company object. In this case a GraphQL resolver has to be created, which will resolve (i.e. provide a value for) those properties which don't exist on a Customer entity. In this project, these resolvers are defined in the resolvers package, just like the main Query resolver, even though conceptually they might seem to do different things. (As far as the GraphQL components are concerned, both objects are still GraphQLResolver objects.)

So, each of those of resolvers could, when requested, query for the supplied customer's related company. However, there are two problems with this approach:

  1. It would lead to the N+1 problem: if the user queried for N customers, each with a related company, the total number of hits to the database would be N+1: one hit for the customers, and N hits for each of the customers' companies.
  2. If two customers had the same company, there would still be two hits to the database, which is redundant.

The solution to the above is the mighty DataLoader: when the resolver is asked for a customer's company, instead of querying the database for it, it returns a "promise" (in the form of a CompletableFuture) which, when needed, will return the value. That "promise" is created by delegating the call to a DataLoader. That data loader is previously set up, providing it with a function which takes in a set of "keys" (unique identifiers, in our example company IDs), and returns the corresponding entities (companies). The caching, and handling of duplicates, is all done by the DataLoader libraries. So at this point, the N+1 problem becomes a 1+1 non-problem :-) There is now one query for customers, and one single query for all the returned customers' companies.

Which leads to the next main subsystem in this project...

  • Data loaders: these are defined in the dataloaders package.

However, there is still an improvement that could be made: the above approach still makes two hits to the database. And obviously as more data related to customers is requested, this will mean more hits to the database. A more performant way of getting the data would be to make a single call to the database, joining the Customer and Company tables. From each single returned row of data, both a Customer and a Company entity could be created. And this where the next main subsystem comes in...

  • Joins are handled in the dataacess/joins package. Here, database joins are defined, and mappings between GraphQL fields and these joins are defined.

When a query containing some joins is executed, each row could result in multiple entities being created (e.g. customers and companies in our example). These need to be cached in the data loaders so that when the GraphQL resolvers are called they can use these pre-cached values. This is done via the EntityCreationListener interface.

One important point to note is that the joins which are included in the query are based on the requested GraphQL fields. So if the client simply requests Customer objects, with no company information, then the Company table should not be included in the query. Therefore the joins are added dynamically at runtime, based on the requested GraphQL fields.

Sample Database

Below is an entity relationship diagram showing the database tables in this example. (This is a completely contrived and unrealistic example - apologies!).

As can be seen, there is a "customer" table, and each customer has a related "company". In order to test some of more complex scenarios (like joining a table to itself, and needing to alias tables when two instances of the same table are included in a query), each customer can have an "out of office delegate", which is simply a reference to another customer record.

Companies have a "primary_contact" (a reference to a customer record), so that circular relationships can be tested (e.g. a customer pointing to a company pointing to a customer...).

The "pricing_details" table contains records which have references to "vat_rate", "discount_rate", and "payment_method" records. This is for an example of an entity (PricingDetails) whose data comes from multiple tables rather than just one table. Companies and Customers both have a reference to the "pricing_details" table.

Finally, there is a "company_partnership" table, which just contains a reference to two companies, which again is an example of an entity whose data is based on two tables, this time where this involves joining the same table twice (once for each of the companies in the partnership).

Sample database entity relationship diagram

Pre-Requisites

Some settings in some of the files (e.g. gradle.properties and build.gradle) mean that as things currently stand the code will only work on Java 10 (and possibly 9: I haven't tried), but not on Java 8. This is because of the changes to how JAXB was bundled up since Java 9. This is discussed here and here. However to get it working in Java 8 should be possible by removing the calls to --add-modules in the two files mentioned, and possibly some other tweaking.

Current Status

  • DataLoader added.
  • JOOQ added.
  • Example data structure created (customers, companies)
  • H2 data access implemented
  • Data loaded by services, and from GraphQL resolvers, primed into data loaders to avoid redundant re-fetching in subsequent resolvers.
  • Joins added (i.e. joins automatically added based on requested GraphQL fields)
  • Repositories based on multiple tables now supported.
  • Entities and GraphQL fields whose data is based on multiple tables supported in join-handling solution.
  • reactive-pg-client swapped in for actual database execution in a fully non-reactive way, rather than using jOOQ's fetchAsync method, which relies on delegating work to a dedicated thread pool.
  • Postgres database (running in a Docker container) swapped in for previous use of H2 database.
  • Coroutines introduced.

To Do

  • Currently this only works with one-to-one and many-to-one joins: one-to-many joins change the number of returned records, and things get even more complicated when multiple one-to-many joins are included, so need to think about whether this is desirable. Possibly compare with what Join Monster does.
  • Add mutations.
  • Unit tests.
  • Test error handling (esp in async code).
  • Implement all TODOs in the code.
  • Separate into modules? Separate framework from example implementation?