You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently this tool only deals with addresses that are available on buildings. If you consider the current state of labeling in Western European countries, a portion of their addresses are labeled as a point on the building and the address of the building is explicitly different from the addresses of the different POIs within that building. These cannot be looked up if you just look up the building.
(but I don't have any good way to deal with this, it is really a problem that can be fix in the future. This issue can be tagged as a "disscussion")
However, perhaps at least we could consider not hard-coding the overpass query statement inline but separating it out as much as possible, so that it can be easily adapted to the labeling conventions of the region in different countries or regions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, yuiseki-san!
This should be an extended discussion about #2.
Currently this tool only deals with addresses that are available on buildings. If you consider the current state of labeling in Western European countries, a portion of their addresses are labeled as a point on the building and the address of the building is explicitly different from the addresses of the different POIs within that building. These cannot be looked up if you just look up the building.
(but I don't have any good way to deal with this, it is really a problem that can be fix in the future. This issue can be tagged as a "disscussion")
However, perhaps at least we could consider not hard-coding the overpass query statement inline but separating it out as much as possible, so that it can be easily adapted to the labeling conventions of the region in different countries or regions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: