You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Many Kerchunk workflows were developed as one-off Jupyter Notebooks that were shared on as a GitHub Gist or at most Medium blog posts/conference presentations. While all these examples were fantastic, it was often difficult to find examples and understand their differences. https://github.com/ProjectPythia/kerchunk-cookbook provided a more consistent structure, but was built after the fact by a small number of people. I think it would be valuable to promote a structure for sharing VirtualiZarr workflows earlier in process, so that they are open, findable, and ideally consistently structured. I also think there's a lot to learn from STAC in this type of community organization and would like to propose mirroring the stactools-packages structure. In this model, we would:
I think it would be great if we had a way for people to easily clone their virtual data stores to a publicly accessible location (to my knowledge this isn't in place for STAC). IIRC @norlandrhagen suggested source.coop as a potential hub for sharing the actual virtual stores.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Many Kerchunk workflows were developed as one-off Jupyter Notebooks that were shared on as a GitHub Gist or at most Medium blog posts/conference presentations. While all these examples were fantastic, it was often difficult to find examples and understand their differences. https://github.com/ProjectPythia/kerchunk-cookbook provided a more consistent structure, but was built after the fact by a small number of people. I think it would be valuable to promote a structure for sharing VirtualiZarr workflows earlier in process, so that they are open, findable, and ideally consistently structured. I also think there's a lot to learn from STAC in this type of community organization and would like to propose mirroring the stactools-packages structure. In this model, we would:
I think it would be great if we had a way for people to easily clone their virtual data stores to a publicly accessible location (to my knowledge this isn't in place for STAC). IIRC @norlandrhagen suggested source.coop as a potential hub for sharing the actual virtual stores.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: