the same cached and misses files bug

[sigaretim]

I have always the same data in these parameters.

number of cached files: 86
number of misses: 86

it means the opcache is not work correctly?

[remicollet]

This just means the first try of each file is a miss.
Raher check the number of hits ;)

[sigaretim]

hm, i have 200 user in 1-2 minutes, and these parametr always same. server is up 7 days. yerterday it was 569 cached and misses, today is 723 cached and the same 723 misses. and always show hit rate as 96% and more. is it real? i think anythink works incorrect. it always show the same information. is it normal?

[sigaretim]

hello) please advice about that

[sigaretim]

anybody help with that, please :-(

[remicollet]

Definitively, I don't see any issue.

[sigaretim]

Hi Remi,

This is my statistics

total memory: 256.00MB
used memory: 1.66MB
free memory: 254.34MB
wasted memory: 0.00b (0%)
number of cached files: 60
number of hits: 805
number of misses: 64
blacklist misses: 0
number of cached keys: 101
max cached keys: 7,963

issue is a about number of misses. this parametr always the same with "number of cached files". is it normal? is opcache working good?

[remicollet]

Sorry, but I don't known how to explain this differently...

[sigaretim]

I just do not understand what you mean-(

Raher check the number of hits

Is it means, i have to check and correct number of hits? Or this is OKay?

[sigaretim]

dont gooo-)

[dstogov]

when you access file first time, it's not in the cache yet.

It's loaded into cache, but "miss" event is recorded.

---

From: sigaretim [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 18:03
To: zendtech/ZendOptimizerPlus
Subject: Re: [zendtech/ZendOptimizerPlus] the same cached and misses files bug (#223)

I just do not understand what you mean-(

Raher check the number of hits
Is it means, i have to check and correct number of hits? Or this is OKay?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/223#issuecomment-203478611

[sigaretim]

Yep, good, now I understood-) Thanks dstogov!