-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
Use AccountTree type wrapper
#783
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 12 commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8ef31ad
feat: Use `AccountTree`
PhilippGackstatter 27e3d43
chore: Adapt to miden-base updates
PhilippGackstatter 24c7814
chore: Add changelog
PhilippGackstatter 4d9bb72
chore: Do not panic in account witness deserialization
PhilippGackstatter 4464e69
chore: Use new ordered batches/tx apis
PhilippGackstatter 9af948d
feat: Use AccountTree in genesis, update account witness
PhilippGackstatter 231a96c
chore: Bump miden-base commit
PhilippGackstatter ef273e4
fix: Clippy lint
PhilippGackstatter cf56adb
chore: Bump miden-base commit
PhilippGackstatter 4fd6dbd
chore: Bump miden-base commit
PhilippGackstatter 060969f
chore: Bump miden-base commit
PhilippGackstatter 0b781bb
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/next' into pgackst-account-tree
PhilippGackstatter bdd89d7
Use next@base
Mirko-von-Leipzig File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this right? Seems like there is no difference between
num_block_created_notesandnum_batch_created_notesand sonum_erased_noteswill always be 0There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah yeah nice catch. It looks like the
blockvariant is incorrect now.ProposedBlock::output_note_batchesshould be used there it seems, though the naming is a bit confusing :)I'll create an issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice catch!