fix(protocol): validate storage slot type at account creation

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
 - Fixed `PrivateOutputNote` construction and deserialization accepting attachment data that is not committed by the note header ([#3556](https://github.com/0xMiden/protocol/pull/3579)).
 - Fixed `input_note::remove_asset` leaving a dangling asset slot when a non-canonical fungible value produced an empty removal remainder ([#3591](https://github.com/0xMiden/protocol/pull/3606)).
 - Fixed `input_note::remove_asset` succeeding when asked to remove an empty or malformed asset ID instead of reporting the asset as not found ([#3592](https://github.com/0xMiden/protocol/pull/3607)).
+- Storage slot types are now validated against the supported set at account creation, and the delta commitment rejects an unrecognized slot type instead of treating it as a map ([#3598](https://github.com/0xMiden/protocol/pull/3608)).
 - Faucet asset-callback procedure roots are now verified against the faucet's account code before dispatch, so a misconfigured callback root can no longer make an asset nontransferable ([#3612](https://github.com/0xMiden/protocol/pull/3612)).
 - [BREAKING] Enforced the limit of 1024 per asset delta op for added and removed account vault deltas inside and outside the tx kernel ([#3623](https://github.com/0xMiden/protocol/pull/3623)).
 

crates/miden-protocol/asm/kernels/transaction-core/src/account.masm

@@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ const ERR_ACCOUNT_PROC_NOT_AUTH_PROC =
 const ERR_ACCOUNT_STORAGE_SLOTS_MUST_BE_SORTED_AND_UNIQUE =
     "slot IDs must be unique and sorted in ascending order"
 
+const ERR_ACCOUNT_STORAGE_SLOT_TYPE_IS_INVALID =
+    "account storage slot has an unsupported type"
+
 const ERR_ACCOUNT_PROCEDURES_MUST_BE_SORTED_AND_UNIQUE =
     "account procedures following the authentication procedure must be unique and sorted in ascending order"
 
@@ -945,61 +948,70 @@ pub proc validate_seed
     # => []
 end
 
-#! Validates that slot IDs are sorted in ascending order and that slot IDs are unique.
+#! Validates that slot IDs are sorted in ascending order, that slot IDs are unique, and that every
+#! slot's type belongs to the set of supported types (value or map).
+#!
+#! Validation should only ever happen on the storage of the native account.
 #!
 #! Inputs:  []
 #! Outputs: []
 #!
-#! Pancis if:
+#! Panics if:
 #! - each slot's ID is not strictly less than the next slot's ID.
 #!    - this ensures sorting and uniqueness among slot IDs.
+#! - any slot has a type that is not a supported storage slot type.
 pub proc validate_storage
-    exec.memory::get_num_storage_slots
+    exec.memory::get_native_num_storage_slots
     # => [num_slots]
 
-    # compute the number of slot ID comparisons we need to make
-    # generally, we need num_storage_slots - 1 comparisons, e.g., if we have 3 slots, we need 2
-    # comparisons: 2 with 1 and 1 with 0.
-    # we subtract 1 if any slots exist and 0 otherwise, notably:
-    # maps 1 storage slot -> 0 comparisons, since 1 slot is always sorted and unique
-    # maps 0 storage slots -> 0 comparisons
-    dup u32gt.0
-    # => [has_slots, num_slots]
-
-    sub
-    # => [num_comparisons]
-
-    # loop if we need to compare slots
+    # iterate over all slots from the last one down to slot 0, validating each slot's type and
+    # comparing each slot's ID against the previous slot's ID
     dup neq.0
-    # => [should_loop, num_comparisons]
+    # => [should_loop, num_slots]
 
     while.true
-        # first iteration: number of comparisons = current slot index
+        # first iteration: remaining = num_slots, slot index = remaining - 1
+        # => [remaining]
+
+        sub.1
         # => [curr_slot_idx]
 
-        dup exec.get_slot_id
-        # => [curr_slot_id_suffix, curr_slot_id_prefix, curr_slot_idx]
+        dup exec.get_native_storage_slot_type
+        # => [slot_type, curr_slot_idx]
+
+        # assert the slot type is value or map
+        dup eq.STORAGE_SLOT_TYPE_VALUE swap eq.STORAGE_SLOT_TYPE_MAP or
+        assert.err=ERR_ACCOUNT_STORAGE_SLOT_TYPE_IS_INVALID
+        # => [curr_slot_idx]
 
-        # we are guaranteed to not underflow because curr_slot_idx is at least 1 at the
-        # beginning of the loop
-        dup.2 sub.1
-        # => [prev_slot_idx, curr_slot_id_suffix, curr_slot_id_prefix, curr_slot_idx]
+        # compare the slot's ID against the previous slot's ID, unless this is slot 0
+        dup neq.0
+        # => [has_prev_slot, curr_slot_idx]
 
-        exec.get_slot_id
-        # => [prev_slot_id_suffix, prev_slot_id_prefix, curr_slot_id_suffix, curr_slot_id_prefix, curr_slot_idx]
+        if.true
+            dup exec.get_native_slot_id
+            # => [curr_slot_id_suffix, curr_slot_id_prefix, curr_slot_idx]
 
-        # this effectively checks that slots are sorted _and_ unique, since duplicate slot IDs are
-        # not less than each other
-        exec.is_slot_id_lt
-        # => [is_prev_lt_curr, curr_slot_idx]
+            # we are guaranteed to not underflow because curr_slot_idx is at least 1 in this branch
+            dup.2 sub.1
+            # => [prev_slot_idx, curr_slot_id_suffix, curr_slot_id_prefix, curr_slot_idx]
 
-        assert.err=ERR_ACCOUNT_STORAGE_SLOTS_MUST_BE_SORTED_AND_UNIQUE
-        # => [curr_slot_idx]
+            exec.get_native_slot_id
+            # => [prev_slot_id_suffix, prev_slot_id_prefix, curr_slot_id_suffix, curr_slot_id_prefix, curr_slot_idx]
 
-        sub.1 dup neq.0
-        # => [should_continue, prev_slot_idx]
+            # this effectively checks that slots are sorted _and_ unique, since duplicate slot IDs
+            # are not less than each other
+            exec.is_slot_id_lt
+            # => [is_prev_lt_curr, curr_slot_idx]
+
+            assert.err=ERR_ACCOUNT_STORAGE_SLOTS_MUST_BE_SORTED_AND_UNIQUE
+            # => [curr_slot_idx]
+        end
+
+        dup neq.0
+        # => [should_continue, curr_slot_idx]
     end
-    # => [prev_slot_idx]
+    # => [curr_slot_idx]
 
     drop
     # => []
@@ -1569,31 +1581,6 @@ pub proc get_native_slot_id
     # => [slot_id_suffix, slot_id_prefix]
 end
 
-#! Gets the slot ID of the storage slot at the provided index.
-#!
-#! WARNING: The index must be in bounds.
-#!
-#! Inputs:  [index]
-#! Outputs: [slot_id_suffix, slot_id_prefix]
-#!
-#! Where:
-#! - index is the index of the slot.
-#! - slot_id_{suffix, prefix} are the suffix and prefix felts of the slot identifier, which are
-#!   the first two felts of the hashed slot name.
-pub proc get_slot_id
-    # convert the index into a memory offset
-    mul.ACCOUNT_STORAGE_SLOT_DATA_LENGTH
-    # => [offset]
-
-    exec.memory::get_account_active_storage_slots_section_ptr
-    add
-    # => [slot_ptr]
-
-    exec.get_slot_id_inner
-    # => [slot_id_suffix, slot_id_prefix]
-end
-
-
 #! Gets the slot ID of the storage slot pointed at by slot_ptr.
 #!
 #! WARNING: The slot_ptr must be valid.

crates/miden-protocol/asm/kernels/transaction-core/src/account_update.masm

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ use miden::tx_kernel_core::memory
 use miden::core::crypto::hashes::poseidon2
 use miden::core::word
 use {ASSET_SIZE, COMPOSITION_NONE} from miden::tx_kernel_core::asset
-use {STORAGE_SLOT_TYPE_VALUE} from miden::tx_kernel_core::constants
+use {STORAGE_SLOT_TYPE_MAP, STORAGE_SLOT_TYPE_VALUE} from miden::tx_kernel_core::constants
 use {ACCOUNT_UPDATE_ASSET_PTR} from miden::tx_kernel_core::memory
 
 # ERRORS
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ const ERR_ACCOUNT_DELTA_TOO_MANY_ADDED_ASSETS =
 const ERR_ACCOUNT_DELTA_TOO_MANY_REMOVED_ASSETS =
     "number of removed assets in the transaction exceeds the maximum limit of 1024"
 
+const ERR_ACCOUNT_STORAGE_SLOT_TYPE_IS_INVALID =
+    "account storage slot has an unsupported type"
+
 # EVENTS
 # =================================================================================================
 
@@ -278,12 +281,19 @@ proc commit_slot_patch
     # => [storage_slot_type, slot_idx, RATE0, RATE1, CAPACITY]
 
     # check if slot is of type value
-    push.STORAGE_SLOT_TYPE_VALUE eq
-    # => [is_value_slot_type, slot_idx, RATE0, RATE1, CAPACITY]
+    dup push.STORAGE_SLOT_TYPE_VALUE eq
+    # => [is_value_slot_type, storage_slot_type, slot_idx, RATE0, RATE1, CAPACITY]
 
     if.true
+        drop
+        # => [slot_idx, RATE0, RATE1, CAPACITY]
+
         exec.commit_value_slot_patch
     else
+        # reject any type that is neither value nor map instead of defaulting to map
+        push.STORAGE_SLOT_TYPE_MAP eq assert.err=ERR_ACCOUNT_STORAGE_SLOT_TYPE_IS_INVALID
+        # => [slot_idx, RATE0, RATE1, CAPACITY]
+
         exec.commit_map_slot_patch
     end
     # => [RATE0, RATE1, CAPACITY]

crates/miden-testing/src/kernel_tests/tx/test_account.rs

@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ use miden_protocol::errors::tx_kernel::{
     ERR_ACCOUNT_NONCE_AT_MAX,
     ERR_ACCOUNT_NONCE_CAN_ONLY_BE_INCREMENTED_ONCE,
     ERR_ACCOUNT_PROCEDURES_MUST_BE_SORTED_AND_UNIQUE,
+    ERR_ACCOUNT_STORAGE_SLOT_TYPE_IS_INVALID,
     ERR_ACCOUNT_UNKNOWN_STORAGE_SLOT_NAME,
 };
 use miden_protocol::field::PrimeField64;
@@ -594,6 +595,36 @@ async fn test_get_native_storage_slot_type() -> anyhow::Result<()> {
     Ok(())
 }
 
+/// Tests that `validate_storage` rejects a storage slot whose type is outside the supported set
+/// (value or map) instead of silently committing it as a map (audit finding L-11).
+#[tokio::test]
+async fn validate_storage_rejects_unsupported_slot_type() -> anyhow::Result<()> {
+    let mock_tx = TestTransactionBuilder::with_existing_mock_account().build().unwrap();
+
+    // Overwrite the type element (offset 1) of the first storage slot with an unsupported type,
+    // then run the new-account storage validation which must reject it.
+    let code = "
+        use miden::tx_kernel_core::account
+        use miden::tx_kernel_core::memory
+        use miden::tx_kernel_core::prologue
+
+        begin
+            exec.prologue::prepare_transaction
+
+            push.2
+            exec.memory::get_native_account_active_storage_slots_ptr add.1
+            mem_store
+
+            exec.account::validate_storage
+        end
+        ";
+
+    let exec_output = mock_tx.execute_code(code).await;
+    assert_execution_error!(exec_output, ERR_ACCOUNT_STORAGE_SLOT_TYPE_IS_INVALID);
+
+    Ok(())
+}
+
 /// Tests that accessing an unknown slot fails with the expected error message.
 ///
 /// This tests both accounts with empty storage and non-empty storage.