We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When I was reading Vite's 6.0 announcement post I studied its CHANGELOG to evaluate whether I will need to make changes to a project I'm working on.
I noticed that one of them swapped fast-glob for something else. Eleventy uses fast-glob, too.
tinyglobby is using fewer dependencies (so something I saw Eleventy is aiming for over the last versions) while maintaining most of the same API.
Evaluate whether it makes sense to swap one library for another.
Sticking to what we always do.
The PR linked from Vite's CHANGELOG: vitejs/vite#18243
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
fast-glob
fdir
tinyglobby
Let’s group up at #3167!
Sorry, something went wrong.
Good call. Totally missed it.
No branches or pull requests
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When I was reading Vite's 6.0 announcement post I studied its CHANGELOG to evaluate whether I will need to make changes to a project I'm working on.
I noticed that one of them swapped fast-glob for something else.
Eleventy uses fast-glob, too.
tinyglobby is using fewer dependencies (so something I saw Eleventy is aiming for over the last versions) while maintaining most of the same API.
Describe the solution you'd like
Evaluate whether it makes sense to swap one library for another.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Sticking to what we always do.
Additional context
The PR linked from Vite's CHANGELOG: vitejs/vite#18243
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: